GeForce GT 335M vs Mobility Radeon HD 565v

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 335M vs Mobility Radeon HD 565v FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 335M vs Mobility Radeon HD 565v: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 335M

2013

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 335M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.2% in PassMark G3D (368 vs 353), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 335M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon HD 565v makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 565v is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 335M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 335M vs Mobility Radeon HD 565v Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 335M

The GeForce GT 335M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 368 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

The Mobility Radeon HD 565v is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 353 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 335M scores 368 and the Mobility Radeon HD 565v reaches 353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 335M is built on Kepler while the Mobility Radeon HD 565v uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 335M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 565v). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 335M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 565v).

Feature	GeForce GT 335M	Mobility Radeon HD 565v
G3D Mark Score	368+4%	353
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7526 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+49%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	32 KB	80 KB+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 335M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 565v leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 335M	Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 335M and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 565v.

Feature	GeForce GT 335M	Mobility Radeon HD 565v
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 335M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 565v). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GT 335M	Mobility Radeon HD 565v
DirectX	11.1 (10_1)+10%	10.1
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 335M) vs UVD 2 (Mobility Radeon HD 565v). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 335M	Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Encoder	None	UVD 2
Decoder	VP4	UVD 2
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 335M draws 50W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 565v's 50W — a 0% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 565v is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 335M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 565v). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GT 335M	Mobility Radeon HD 565v
TDP	50W	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	7.4+4%	7.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 335M (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GT 335M	Mobility Radeon HD 565v
MSRP	—	$99
Codename	GK107	Broadway
Release	June 25 2013	January 7 2010
Ranking	#726	#846

Search GeForce GT 335M on Amazon

Search Mobility Radeon HD 565v on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.