
GeForce GT 335M vs Mobility Radeon HD 3850

GeForce GT 335M
Popular choices:

Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 335M is positioned at rank 131 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is on rank 620, so the GeForce GT 335M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 335M
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 335M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 3850.
| Insight | GeForce GT 335M | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 65.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 335M | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+65.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Counter-Strike 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 335M and Mobility Radeon HD 3850

GeForce GT 335M
The GeForce GT 335M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 368 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 3850
The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 366 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 335M scores 368 and the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 reaches 366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 335M is built on Kepler while the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 335M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3850). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 335M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3850).
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 368 | 366 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7526 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+49% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 80 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 335M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 335M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 335M draws 50W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 3850's 50W — a 0% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 335M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3850). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.4+1% | 7.3 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 3850 costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.7 (GeForce GT 335M) vs 24.4 (Mobility Radeon HD 3850) — the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 offers 66% better value. The GeForce GT 335M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Mobility Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $15-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 24.4+66% |
| Codename | GK107 | Broadway |
| Release | June 25 2013 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #726 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














