GeForce GT 335M vs GeForce GTS 350M

GeForce GT 335M

2013Core: 980 MHz

GeForce GTS 350M

2010Core: 783 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GT 335M

368

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce GTS 350M

106

381

+3.5%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 335M is positioned at rank 131 and the GeForce GTS 350M is on rank 162, so the GeForce GT 335M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 335M

#121

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

295%

#123

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

267%

#124

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

267%

#128

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

243%

#129

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

241%

#131

GeForce GT 335M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

100%

#139

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

MSRP: $55|Avg: $40

97%

#145

Radeon RX 580 (móvel)

MSRP: $229|Avg: $65

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 350M

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

952%

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

915%

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

904%

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

902%

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

901%

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

895%

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

884%

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

881%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

873%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

870%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

860%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

858%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

843%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

842%

#90

GeForce RTX 5090 D v2

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $4086.44

98%

#91

Radeon Ryzen 5 150

MSRP: $350|Avg: $350

97%

#92

Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

95%

#147

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

1050%

#162

GeForce GTS 350M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#164

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

MSRP: $173|Avg: $35

99%

#165

Radeon HD 6520G

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

98%

#166

GeForce GT 545

MSRP: $149|Avg: $20

98%

#167

Radeon HD 8470D

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

98%

#170

GeForce GT 340

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

97%

#171

GeForce GT 230

MSRP: $44|Avg: $44

96%

#172

Radeon HD 6670

MSRP: $99|Avg: $99

96%

#175

Radeon R5 420

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

94%

#176

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

MSRP: $118|Avg: $50

94%

#177

Radeon HD 6570

MSRP: $79|Avg: $79

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTS 350M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 335M.

Insight	GeForce GT 335M	GeForce GTS 350M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTS 350M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 335M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTS 350M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 335M and GeForce GTS 350M

GeForce GT 335M

The GeForce GT 335M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 368 points.

GeForce GTS 350M

The GeForce GTS 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $129.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 335M scores 368 and the GeForce GTS 350M reaches 381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 335M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTS 350M uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 335M) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 350M). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 335M) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 350M).

Feature	GeForce GT 335M	GeForce GTS 350M
G3D Mark Score	368	381+4%
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+100%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7526 TFLOPS+25%	0.6013 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	32 KB	256 KB+700%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 335M	GeForce GTS 350M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GT 335M	GeForce GTS 350M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 335M) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 350M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 335M	GeForce GTS 350M
DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	11.1 (10_1)
OpenGL	3.3+57%	2.1
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 335M) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 350M). Decoder: VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 335M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 350M).

Feature	GeForce GT 335M	GeForce GTS 350M
Encoder	None	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	VP4	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 335M draws 50W versus the GeForce GTS 350M's 106W — a 71.8% difference. The GeForce GT 335M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 335M) vs 350W (GeForce GTS 350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.