
GeForce GT 335M vs Radeon HD 8510G

GeForce GT 335M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8510G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 335M is positioned at rank 131 and the Radeon HD 8510G is on rank 150, so the GeForce GT 335M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 335M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8510G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8510G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 335M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8510G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8510G holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $25), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 406.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+406.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 335M and Radeon HD 8510G

GeForce GT 335M
The GeForce GT 335M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 368 points.

Radeon HD 8510G
The Radeon HD 8510G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 373 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 335M scores 368 and the Radeon HD 8510G reaches 373 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 335M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8510G uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 335M) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8510G). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 335M) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8510G).
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 368 | 373+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7526 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+134% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 256 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 335M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8510G has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 335M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 335M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8510G) — the Radeon HD 8510G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 335M) vs 11_0 (Radeon HD 8510G). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 11_0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 335M) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 8510G). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 335M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon HD 8510G).
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 335M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 8510G's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The GeForce GT 335M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 335M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8510G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-62% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.4+155% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8510G costs 80% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.7 (GeForce GT 335M) vs 74.6 (Radeon HD 8510G) — the Radeon HD 8510G offers 407.5% better value. The GeForce GT 335M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 335M | Radeon HD 8510G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $45 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $5-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 74.6+407% |
| Codename | GK107 | Pitcairn |
| Release | June 25 2013 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #726 | #503 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















