GeForce GT 335M
VS
GeForce GT 705

GeForce GT 335M vs GeForce GT 705

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 335M

2013Core: 980 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 705

2014Core: 993 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 335M is positioned at rank 131 and the GeForce GT 705 is on rank 199, so the GeForce GT 335M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 335M

#121
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
295%
#123
267%
#124
267%
#128
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
243%
#129
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
241%
#131
GeForce GT 335M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
100%
#139
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
97%
#145
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
MSRP: $229|Avg: $65
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 705

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1176%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1129%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1116%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1114%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1112%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1106%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1092%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1088%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1078%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1075%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1062%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1060%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1041%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1040%
#184
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1297%
#199
GeForce GT 705
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#200
Radeon HD 7340
MSRP: $25|Avg: $5
99%
#201
Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
96%
#202
GeForce GT 320
MSRP: $79|Avg: $30
96%
#203
Radeon R5 A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
#204
Radeon HD 7580D
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
95%
#205
Radeon HD 7470
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
94%
#206
Radeon R5 A240
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
#207
Radeon HD 6550D
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
93%
#208
Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $67
92%
#209
Radeon R5 235X
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
92%
#210
Radeon R7 A360
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
92%
#211
Radeon HD 7290
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
91%
#212
Radeon HD 8210
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
90%
#213
Radeon HD 8330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
89%
#214
GeForce GT 520
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 705 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 335M.

InsightGeForce GT 335MGeForce GT 705
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GT 705 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 705 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $25), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 67.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GT 335MGeForce GT 705
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+67.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 335M and GeForce GT 705

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 335M

The GeForce GT 335M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 368 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 705

The GeForce GT 705 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 370 points. Launch price was $89.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 335M scores 368 and the GeForce GT 705 reaches 370 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 335M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 705 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 335M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 705). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 335M) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 705).

FeatureGeForce GT 335MGeForce GT 705
G3D Mark Score
368
370
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7526 TFLOPS
0.7626 TFLOPS+1%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 335MGeForce GT 705
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 335MGeForce GT 705
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 335M) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 705). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 335MGeForce GT 705
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
11.0
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
3.3
4.1+24%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 335M) vs No (GeForce GT 705). Decoder: VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 335M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 705).

FeatureGeForce GT 335MGeForce GT 705
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
VP4
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 335M draws 50W versus the GeForce GT 705's 64W — a 24.6% difference. The GeForce GT 335M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 335M) vs 250W (GeForce GT 705). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 335MGeForce GT 705
TDP
50W-22%
64W
Recommended PSU
350W
250W-29%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
145mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85
65°C-24%
Perf/Watt
7.4+28%
5.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 705 costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.7 (GeForce GT 335M) vs 24.7 (GeForce GT 705) — the GeForce GT 705 offers 68% better value. The GeForce GT 705 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 335MGeForce GT 705
MSRP
$60
Avg Price (30d)
$25
$15-40%
Performance per Dollar
14.7
24.7+68%
Codename
GK107
GK107
Release
June 25 2013
May 29 2014
Ranking
#726
#777