GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GT 335M
GeForce GT 130
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 335M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 130 is positioned at rank 267 and the GeForce GT 335M is on rank 131, so the GeForce GT 335M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 130
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 335M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 335M.
| Insight | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 130 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 130 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $25), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 29.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+29.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 130 and GeForce GT 335M
GeForce GT 130
The GeForce GT 130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $79.
GeForce GT 335M
The GeForce GT 335M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 368 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 130 scores 381 and the GeForce GT 335M reaches 368 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GT 335M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130) vs 384 (GeForce GT 335M). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 335M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 381+4% | 368 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS+50% | 0.7526 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+350% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 130 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 335M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 130 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 130) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 335M) — the GeForce GT 130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB+50% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 130) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 335M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.1 (10_1)+11% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 130) vs None (GeForce GT 335M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 335M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 130 draws 30W versus the GeForce GT 335M's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130) vs 350W (GeForce GT 335M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.7+72% | 7.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 130 costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.1 (GeForce GT 130) vs 14.7 (GeForce GT 335M) — the GeForce GT 130 offers 29.9% better value. The GeForce GT 130 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GT 335M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-20% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.1+30% | 14.7 |
| Codename | GP108 | GK107 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | June 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #641 | #726 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 130 and GeForce GT 335M
