GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce GT 130

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800M GTS

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce GT 130 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce GT 130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce GT 130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8800M GTS

2008

Why buy it

  • 15.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

GeForce GT 130

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 8800M GTS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 8800M GTS is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (382 vs 381), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 8800M GTS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 130 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 130 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 8800M GTS has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce GT 130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800M GTS

The GeForce 8800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130

The GeForce GT 130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8800M GTS scores 382 and the GeForce GT 130 reaches 381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800M GTS is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 130 uses Pascal, both on 65 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 384 (GeForce GT 130).

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce GT 130
G3D Mark Score
382
381
Architecture
G9x
Pascal
Process Node
65 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
224
384+71%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce GT 130
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8800M GTS has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 130 carries 2 GB. GeForce GT 130 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8800M GTS and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 130.

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce GT 130
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1.5 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 10.0 (GeForce GT 130). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce GT 130
DirectX
10.0
10.0
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs No (GeForce GT 130). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130).

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce GT 130
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8800M GTS draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 130's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GT 130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 350W (GeForce GT 130). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce GT 130
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
95°C
75°C-21%
Perf/Watt
2.5
12.7+408%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 130 (2017 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce GT 130
MSRP
$100
Codename
NB9E-GTX
GP108
Release
July 15 2008
May 17 2017
Ranking
#825
#641

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.