GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce GT 620

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce GT 620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce GT 620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8800M GTS

2008

Why buy it

✅52.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.

GeForce GT 620

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 8800M GTS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 8800M GTS is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 52.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 620 instead at 388 vs 382, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8800M GTS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 620 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 620 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 8800M GTS has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce GT 620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8800M GTS

The GeForce 8800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points.

GeForce GT 620

The GeForce GT 620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8800M GTS scores 382 and the GeForce GT 620 reaches 388 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800M GTS is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 620 uses Kepler, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 384 (GeForce GT 620).

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 620
G3D Mark Score	382	388+2%
Architecture	G9x	Kepler
Process Node	65 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	224	384+71%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 620
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8800M GTS and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 620.

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 620
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 620). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 620
DirectX	10.0	11.0+10%
Vulkan	None	None
OpenGL	3.3	4.2+27%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs No (GeForce GT 620). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620).

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 620
Encoder	No	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP2	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8800M GTS draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 620's 65W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce GT 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 250W (GeForce GT 620). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 620
TDP	150W	65W-57%
Recommended PSU	350W	250W-29%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	0mm	145mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	95°C	70°C-26%
Perf/Watt	2.5	6.0+140%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 620 (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 8800M GTS	GeForce GT 620
MSRP	—	$59
Codename	NB9E-GTX	GK107
Release	July 15 2008	June 5 2012
Ranking	#825	#837

Search GeForce 8800M GTS on Amazon

Search GeForce GT 620 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.