CPU
GPU
GeForce 8800M GTS
Popular choices:
GeForce GTS 350M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 350M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8800M GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTS 350M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 8800M GTS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8800M GTS and GeForce GTS 350M
GeForce 8800M GTS
The GeForce 8800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points.
GeForce GTS 350M
The GeForce GTS 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8800M GTS scores 382 and the GeForce GTS 350M reaches 381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800M GTS is built on G9x while the GeForce GTS 350M uses Fermi, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 350M).
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 382 | 381 |
| Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 224+17% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8800M GTS comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 350M has 1 GB. The GeForce GTS 350M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 350M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.1 (10_1)+11% |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 350M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 350M).
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8800M GTS draws 150W versus the GeForce GTS 350M's 106W — a 34.4% difference. The GeForce GTS 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 350W (GeForce GTS 350M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8800M GTS | GeForce GTS 350M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 106W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 85°C-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.5 | 3.6+44% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8800M GTS and GeForce GTS 350M
