GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 6490M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6490M

2011Core: 680 MHz

GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 6490M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 6490M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 6490M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 130

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • βœ…200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6490M across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6490M

2011

Why buy it

  • βœ…7.9% more average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6490M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.9% in average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 130 instead at 381 vs 378, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 130 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 130 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6490M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 6490M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130

The GeForce GT 130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon HD 6490M

The Radeon HD 6490M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 378 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 130 scores 381 and the Radeon HD 6490M reaches 378 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 6490M uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6490M). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6490M).

FeatureGeForce GT 130Radeon HD 6490M
G3D Mark Score
381
378
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale 2
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
960+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS
1.306 TFLOPS+16%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
24
48+100%
L1 Cache
144 KB
192 KB+33%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 130 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6490M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 130Radeon HD 6490M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 130 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6490M carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 130 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 130 and System on the Radeon HD 6490M.

FeatureGeForce GT 130Radeon HD 6490M
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB+200%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 130 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6490M's 75W β€” a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GT 130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6490M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 130Radeon HD 6490M
TDP
30W-60%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
229mm
β€”
Height
111mm
β€”
Slots
1
β€”
Temp (Load)
75Β°C
β€”
Perf/Watt
12.7+154%
5.0
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 130 (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GT 130Radeon HD 6490M
MSRP
$100
β€”
Codename
GP108
Blackcomb
Release
May 17 2017
January 4 2011
Ranking
#641
#654

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.