GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GTX 260M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 260M

2008Core: 576 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GTX 260M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GTX 260M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GTX 260M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 130

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 182W, a 152W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 260M across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 260M

2008

Why buy it

  • 3.6% more average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 506.7% higher power demand at 182W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 260M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.6% in average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (382 vs 381), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 130 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 65nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 130 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 260M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GTX 260M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130

The GeForce GT 130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $79.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 260M

The GeForce GTX 260M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 182W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 130 scores 381 and the GeForce GTX 260M reaches 382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 260M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 260M). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130) vs 0.4769 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 260M).

FeatureGeForce GT 130GeForce GTX 260M
G3D Mark Score
381
382
Architecture
Pascal
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS+136%
0.4769 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
28+75%
TMUs
24
64+167%
L2 Cache
512 KB+129%
224 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 130GeForce GTX 260M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 130 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 260M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 130 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 130 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 260M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 130) vs 224 KB (GeForce GTX 260M) — the GeForce GT 130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 130GeForce GTX 260M
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB+50%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+129%
224 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 130) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 260M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 130GeForce GTX 260M
DirectX
10.0
11.1 (10_0)+11%
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 130) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 260M).

FeatureGeForce GT 130GeForce GTX 260M
Encoder
No
PureVideo HD VP2
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 130 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 260M's 182W — a 143.4% difference. The GeForce GT 130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 260M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 130GeForce GTX 260M
TDP
30W-84%
182W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
12.7+505%
2.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 130 (2017 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GT 130GeForce GTX 260M
MSRP
$100
Codename
GP108
GT200
Release
May 17 2017
June 16 2008
Ranking
#641
#821

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.