
GeForce GT 130

GeForce GTX 260M
GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GTX 260M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GTX 260M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GTX 260M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 130
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 182W, a 152W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 260M across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce GTX 260M
2008Why buy it
- ✅3.6% more average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌506.7% higher power demand at 182W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GTX 260M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 130
The GeForce GT 130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce GTX 260M
The GeForce GTX 260M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 182W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 130 scores 381 and the GeForce GTX 260M reaches 382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 260M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 260M). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130) vs 0.4769 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 260M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 381 | 382 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS+136% | 0.4769 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 28+75% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+129% | 224 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 130 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 260M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 130 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 130 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 260M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 130) vs 224 KB (GeForce GTX 260M) — the GeForce GT 130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB+50% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+129% | 224 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 130) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 260M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.1 (10_0)+11% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 130) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 260M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 130 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 260M's 182W — a 143.4% difference. The GeForce GT 130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 260M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-84% | 182W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.7+505% | 2.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GT 130 (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | GeForce GTX 260M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Codename | GP108 | GT200 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | June 16 2008 |
| Ranking | #641 | #821 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














