GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GT 620

CPU

GPU

GeForce GT 130

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 620

2012Core: 902 MHz

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GT 620 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 130

1.5 GB 30

381

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce GT 620

0.5 GB 65

388

+1.8%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GT 620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GT 620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 130

2017

Why buy it

✅32.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 65W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
69.5% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
❌57.9% longer card at 229mm vs 145mm.

GeForce GT 620

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $41 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 72.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌116.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 130 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 620 instead at 388 vs 381, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 130 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 620 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $41 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 72.6% (6.6 vs 3.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 620 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 130 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GT 620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 130

The GeForce GT 130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce GT 620

The GeForce GT 620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 130 scores 381 and the GeForce GT 620 reaches 388 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GT 620 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130) vs 384 (GeForce GT 620). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620).

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 620
G3D Mark Score	381	388+2%
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS+63%	0.6927 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	144 KB+350%	32 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 620
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 130 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 620 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 130 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 130 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 620. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 130) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 620) — the GeForce GT 130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 620
VRAM Capacity	1.5 GB+200%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 130) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 620). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 620
DirectX	10.0	11.0+10%
Vulkan	None	None
OpenGL	3.3	4.2+27%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 130) vs No (GeForce GT 620). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620).

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 620
Encoder	No	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP3	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 130 draws 30W versus the GeForce GT 620's 65W — a 73.7% difference. The GeForce GT 130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130) vs 250W (GeForce GT 620). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 620
TDP	30W-54%	65W
Recommended PSU	350W	250W-29%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	229mm	145mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	12.7+112%	6.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 130 came in at $100, while the GeForce GT 620 launched at $59. On MSRP, GeForce GT 620 was 41% cheaper ($41 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (GeForce GT 130) vs 6.6 (GeForce GT 620) — the GeForce GT 620 offers 73.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 130 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 620
MSRP	$100	$59-41%
Performance per Dollar	3.8	6.6+74%
Codename	GP108	GK107
Release	May 17 2017	June 5 2012
Ranking	#641	#837

Search GeForce GT 130 on Amazon

Search GeForce GT 620 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.