GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 5550

CPU

GPU

GeForce GT 130

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon HD 5550

2009Core: 725 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 5550 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 130

1.5 GB 30

381

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

Radeon HD 5550

2 GB 151

384

+0.8%

Mobility Radeon. HD 5470

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

Radeon RX 7600M XT

Radeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 5550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 5550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 130

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 151W, a 121W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 5550 across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
33.3% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$75 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).

Radeon HD 5550

2009

Why buy it

✅15.8% more average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 34.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($75 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌403.3% higher power demand at 151W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 5550 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.8% in average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (384 vs 381), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 130 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 5550 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $25 cheaper on MSRP at $75 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 34.4% (5.1 vs 3.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 5550 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 130 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 5550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 130

The GeForce GT 130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon HD 5550

The Radeon HD 5550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 30 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1440 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 384 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 130 scores 381 and the Radeon HD 5550 reaches 384 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 5550 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130) vs 1,440 (Radeon HD 5550). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130) vs 2.088 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5550).

Feature	GeForce GT 130	Radeon HD 5550
G3D Mark Score	381	384
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1440+275%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	2.088 TFLOPS+85%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	72+200%
L1 Cache	144 KB	144 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 130 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 5550 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 130	Radeon HD 5550
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 130 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5550 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 5550 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 130 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5550.

Feature	GeForce GT 130	Radeon HD 5550
VRAM Capacity	1.5 GB	2 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 130) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 5550). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 130	Radeon HD 5550
DirectX	10.0	11.2 (11_0)+12%
Vulkan	None	N/A
OpenGL	3.3	4.4+33%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 130) vs None (Radeon HD 5550). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 5550).

Feature	GeForce GT 130	Radeon HD 5550
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP3	UVD 2.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 130 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 5550's 151W — a 133.7% difference. The GeForce GT 130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130) vs 200W (Radeon HD 5550). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70.

Feature	GeForce GT 130	Radeon HD 5550
TDP	30W-80%	151W
Recommended PSU	350W	200W-43%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	229mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	75°C	70-7%
Perf/Watt	12.7+408%	2.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 130 came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 5550 launched at $75. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5550 was 25% cheaper ($25 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (GeForce GT 130) vs 5.1 (Radeon HD 5550) — the Radeon HD 5550 offers 34.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 130 (2017 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce GT 130	Radeon HD 5550
MSRP	$100	$75-25%
Performance per Dollar	3.8	5.1+34%
Codename	GP108	Cypress
Release	May 17 2017	September 30 2009
Ranking	#641	#682

Search GeForce GT 130 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 5550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.