GeForce GT 130
Radeon HD 4670
GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 4670 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 4670 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 130
2017Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌49.3% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$67 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
- ❌18.7% longer card at 229mm vs 193mm.
Radeon HD 4670
2010Why buy it
- ✅18.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 193mm instead of 229mm, a 36mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 130 vs Radeon HD 4670 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GT 130
The GeForce GT 130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $79.
Radeon HD 4670
The Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 130 scores 381 and the Radeon HD 4670 reaches 382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 4670). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4670). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 381 | 382 |
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1536+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+140% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+67% | 880 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 96+300% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 192 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 130 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 130 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4670 carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 130 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 130 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4670.
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB+50% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 130) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4670). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 130 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 4670's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The GeForce GT 130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130) vs 300W (Radeon HD 4670). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 193mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-88% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 229mm | 193mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 12.7+747% | 1.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 130 came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4670 was 33% cheaper ($33 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (GeForce GT 130) vs 5.7 (Radeon HD 4670) — the Radeon HD 4670 offers 50% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 130 (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 130 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $67-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.8 | 5.7+50% |
| Codename | GP108 | Cayman |
| Release | May 17 2017 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #641 | #596 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 130 and Radeon HD 4670
