G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GT 625 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GT 625: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 130

2017

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 625 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
66.7% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

GeForce GT 625

2010

Why buy it

✅1.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 64% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 625 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 130 instead at 381 vs 375, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 130 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 625 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $60 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 64% (6.3 vs 3.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 625 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 130 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 130 vs GeForce GT 625 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 130

The GeForce GT 130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce GT 625

The GeForce GT 625 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 130 scores 381 and the GeForce GT 625 reaches 375 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GT 625 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130) vs 352 (GeForce GT 625). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625).

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 625
G3D Mark Score	381+2%	375
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+9%	352
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS+32%	0.8554 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	44+83%
L1 Cache	144 KB	704 KB+389%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 625
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 130 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 625 carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 130 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 130 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 625.

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 625
VRAM Capacity	1.5 GB+50%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 130) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 625). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 625
DirectX	10.0	12 (11_0)+20%
Vulkan	None	N/A
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 130) vs None (GeForce GT 625). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD (VP5). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 625).

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 625
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP3	PureVideo HD (VP5)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 130 draws 30W versus the GeForce GT 625's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The GeForce GT 130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130) vs 250W (GeForce GT 625). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70.

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 625
TDP	30W-85%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	250W-29%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	229mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	75°C	70-7%
Perf/Watt	12.7+568%	1.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 130 came in at $100, while the GeForce GT 625 launched at $60. On MSRP, GeForce GT 625 was 40% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (GeForce GT 130) vs 6.3 (GeForce GT 625) — the GeForce GT 625 offers 65.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 130 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GT 130	GeForce GT 625
MSRP	$100	$60-40%
Performance per Dollar	3.8	6.3+66%
Codename	GP108	GF100
Release	May 17 2017	May 31 2010
Ranking	#641	#618

Search GeForce GT 130 on Amazon

Search GeForce GT 625 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.