Radeon HD 8410G
VS
GeForce GT 525M

Radeon HD 8410G vs GeForce GT 525M

AMD

Radeon HD 8410G

2012Core: 1000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 525M

2013Core: 980 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8410G is positioned at rank 116 and the GeForce GT 525M is on rank 183, so the Radeon HD 8410G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8410G

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
667%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
641%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
633%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
632%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
631%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
627%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
619%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
617%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
611%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
610%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
602%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
601%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
590%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
590%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
91%
#101
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
735%
#116
Radeon HD 8410G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
100%
#117
RADEON HD6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#118
Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
97%
#119
Radeon 535
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#122
GeForce GTS 450
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
95%
#123
Radeon HD 8570D
MSRP: $40|Avg: $15
95%
#125
Radeon HD 8650G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#126
GeForce GT 630
MSRP: $69|Avg: $20
91%
#127
Radeon HD 6770
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
91%
#129
GeForce GT 440
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
90%
#130
Radeon R7 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 525M

#173
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
361%
#175
327%
#176
326%
#180
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
297%
#181
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
295%
#183
GeForce GT 525M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#186
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#187
GeForce MX550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
94%
#197
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 525M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8410G.

InsightRadeon HD 8410GGeForce GT 525M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%)
Leading raw performance (+3.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 8410G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8410G holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $30), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 478.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 8410GGeForce GT 525M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+478.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8410G and GeForce GT 525M

AMD

Radeon HD 8410G

The Radeon HD 8410G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 435 points. Launch price was $349.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 525M

The GeForce GT 525M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 451 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8410G scores 435 and the GeForce GT 525M reaches 451 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8410G is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 525M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8410G) vs 384 (GeForce GT 525M). Raw compute: 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8410G) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 525M).

FeatureRadeon HD 8410GGeForce GT 525M
G3D Mark Score
435
451+4%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280+233%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.56 TFLOPS+240%
0.7526 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+150%
32
L1 Cache
320 KB+900%
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8410GGeForce GT 525M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8410G comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 525M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 525M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 8410G) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 525M) — the Radeon HD 8410G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 8410GGeForce GT 525M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 8410G) vs 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 525M). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 8410GGeForce GT 525M
DirectX
11.2
12 (FL11_0)+7%
OpenGL
4.4+5%
4.2
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8410G) vs VP4 (GeForce GT 525M). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 8410G) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 525M).

FeatureRadeon HD 8410GGeForce GT 525M
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VP4
Decoder
UVD 3.2
VP4
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8410G draws 200W versus the GeForce GT 525M's 50W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GT 525M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8410G) vs 350W (GeForce GT 525M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 8410GGeForce GT 525M
TDP
200W
50W-75%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
2.2
9.0+309%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 8410G costs 83.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.0 (Radeon HD 8410G) vs 15.0 (GeForce GT 525M) — the Radeon HD 8410G offers 480% better value. The GeForce GT 525M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 8410GGeForce GT 525M
MSRP
$40
Avg Price (30d)
$5-83%
$30
Performance per Dollar
87.0+480%
15.0
Codename
Pitcairn
GK107
Release
March 5 2012
June 25 2013
Ranking
#460
#726