Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual vs Quadro FX 2700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual is positioned at rank 549 and the Quadro FX 2700 is on rank 203, so the Quadro FX 2700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual

#538

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2983%

#540

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

2704%

#541

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

2697%

#545

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

2452%

#546

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

2435%

#548

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

100%

#549

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#550

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7400M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $72

100%

#551

Radeon HD 7600G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

100%

#552

Radeon R5 M255

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

99%

#553

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

98%

#554

Mobility Radeon HD 530v

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

98%

#555

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

97%

#557

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

95%

#558

Radeon HD 8690A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

94%

#559

Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7550M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

93%

#560

Radeon HD 7620G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

93%

#561

Radeon HD 8450G + HD 8750M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

92%

#562

GeForce 9200

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

92%

#563

Radeon R7 M265DX

MSRP: $149|Avg: $40

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2700

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

99%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

98%

#90

Quadro P5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

94%

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

92%

#92

RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

90%

#93

Quadro RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

90%

#188

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2721%

#203

Quadro FX 2700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#206

FirePro V3900

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

98%

#207

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

MSRP: $119|Avg: $89

97%

#208

Tesla K8

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

94%

#210

GRID K240Q

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

94%

#211

FirePro M4150

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

93%

#212

FirePro V4900

MSRP: $200|Avg: $47

93%

#213

GRID K160Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $30

92%

#215

Quadro

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

92%

#216

FirePro W5000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 2700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual	Quadro FX 2700
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 2700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 2700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $150), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 198.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual	Quadro FX 2700
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+198.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)	✅More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 2700 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual and Quadro FX 2700

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 546 points.

Quadro FX 2700

The Quadro FX 2700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual scores 546 and the Quadro FX 2700 reaches 543 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2700).

Feature	Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual	Quadro FX 2700
G3D Mark Score	546	543
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	640+167%	240

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual	Quadro FX 2700
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2700 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 2700 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual	Quadro FX 2700
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 2700's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual	Quadro FX 2700
TDP	50W-74%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	10.9+276%	2.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Quadro FX 2700 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Quadro FX 2700 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.6 (Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual) vs 10.9 (Quadro FX 2700) — the Quadro FX 2700 offers 202.8% better value. The Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).