Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual
VS
FireStream 9170

Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual vs FireStream 9170

AMD

Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual

2013Core: 720 / 825 MHz
VS

FireStream 9170

2010Core: 825 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual is positioned at rank 507 and the FireStream 9170 is on rank 393, so the FireStream 9170 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual

#497
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2519%
#499
2284%
#500
2277%
#504
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2071%
#505
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2057%
#507
100%
#508
Radeon R7 M460
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#509
Mobility Radeon HD 3870
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
99%
#510
GeForce 9800 S
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
98%
#511
98%
#512
Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#513
97%
#514
Radeon HD 7660D
MSRP: $122|Avg: $15
97%
#515
Radeon HD 8650G + 8500M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#516
96%
#517
GeForce 8200
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
95%
#518
Mobility Radeon HD 545v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#519
GeForce 9500M G
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
94%
#520
94%
#521
94%
#522
Radeon HD 8550G + 8500M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9170

#377
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
46166%
#392
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
100%
#393
FireStream 9170
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20
100%
#394
Quadro FX 1700
MSRP: $699|Avg: $500
97%
#395
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
94%
#396
Quadro FX 540
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
84%
#397
Quadro FX 1500
MSRP: $699|Avg: $30
75%
#398
Quadro 7000
MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300
75%
#399
Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50
75%
#400
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
72%
#401
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
72%
#402
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
69%
#404
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
63%
#405
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
63%
#406
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
56%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FireStream 9170 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual.

InsightRadeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M DualFireStream 9170
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FireStream 9170 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FireStream 9170 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 50.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M DualFireStream 9170
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+50.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual and FireStream 9170

AMD

Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual

The Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 646 points.

AMD

FireStream 9170

The FireStream 9170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 647 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual scores 646 and the FireStream 9170 reaches 647 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual) vs 1,600 (FireStream 9170).

FeatureRadeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M DualFireStream 9170
G3D Mark Score
646
647
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640
1600+150%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M DualFireStream 9170
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M DualFireStream 9170
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual) vs 10.1 (FireStream 9170). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M DualFireStream 9170
DirectX
11.2+11%
10.1
Max Displays
0
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual) vs None (FireStream 9170). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD+.

FeatureRadeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M DualFireStream 9170
Encoder
VCE 1.0
None
Decoder
UVD 3
UVD+
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual draws 50W versus the FireStream 9170's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual) vs 350W (FireStream 9170). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M DualFireStream 9170
TDP
50W-78%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
12.9+345%
2.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FireStream 9170 launched at $1999 and now averages $20. The FireStream 9170 costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.5 (Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual) vs 32.4 (FireStream 9170) — the FireStream 9170 offers 50.7% better value. The Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M DualFireStream 9170
MSRP
$150-92%
$1999
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$20-33%
Performance per Dollar
21.5
32.4+51%
Codename
Cypress
Release
August 1 2013
June 23 2010
Ranking
#863
#631