Radeon HD 8610G vs GeForce GT 620
Radeon HD 8610G
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8610G is positioned at rank 605 and the GeForce GT 620 is on rank 190, so the GeForce GT 620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8610G
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 620
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8610G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 620.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $150), it costs 87% less, resulting in a 625.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+625.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8610G and GeForce GT 620
Radeon HD 8610G
The Radeon HD 8610G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 401 points.
GeForce GT 620
The GeForce GT 620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8610G scores 401 and the GeForce GT 620 reaches 388 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8610G is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 620 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon HD 8610G) vs 384 (GeForce GT 620). Raw compute: 0.528 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8610G) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 401+3% | 388 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 384+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.528 TFLOPS | 0.6927 TFLOPS+31% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 20 | 32+60% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB+150% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon HD 8610G) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 620) — the GeForce GT 620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FL 11_0) (Radeon HD 8610G) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 620). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (FL 11_0)+2% | 11.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4+5% | 4.2 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8610G) vs No (GeForce GT 620). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 8610G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8610G draws 50W versus the GeForce GT 620's 65W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon HD 8610G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8610G) vs 250W (GeForce GT 620). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-23% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 8.0+33% | 6.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8610G launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GT 620 launched at $59 and now averages $20. The GeForce GT 620 costs 86.7% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (Radeon HD 8610G) vs 19.4 (GeForce GT 620) — the GeForce GT 620 offers 618.5% better value. The Radeon HD 8610G is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT 620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $59-61% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $20-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 19.4+619% |
| Codename | Sun | GK107 |
| Release | March 1 2013 | June 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #891 | #837 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8610G and GeForce GT 620
