
Radeon HD 8610G vs GeForce GT625M

Radeon HD 8610G
Popular choices:

GeForce GT625M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8610G is positioned at rank 605 and the GeForce GT625M is on rank 195, so the GeForce GT625M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8610G
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT625M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT625M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8610G.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT625M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT625M holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $150), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 250.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+250.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8610G and GeForce GT625M

Radeon HD 8610G
The Radeon HD 8610G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 401 points.

GeForce GT625M
The GeForce GT625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 422 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 8610G scores 401 versus the GeForce GT625M's 422 — the GeForce GT625M leads by 5.2%. The Radeon HD 8610G is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT625M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon HD 8610G) vs 384 (GeForce GT625M). Raw compute: 0.528 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8610G) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT625M). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 950 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 401 | 422+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 384+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.528 TFLOPS | 0.7296 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 950 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 20 | 32+60% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB+150% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon HD 8610G) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT625M) — the GeForce GT625M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FL 11_0) (Radeon HD 8610G) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT625M). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (FL 11_0) | 12 (11_0)+7% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8610G) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GT625M). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 8610G) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT625M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | No NVENC (Fermi) |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8610G draws 50W versus the GeForce GT625M's 45W — a 10.5% difference. The GeForce GT625M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8610G) vs 350W (GeForce GT625M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 45W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 8.0 | 9.4+18% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT625M costs 70% less ($105 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (Radeon HD 8610G) vs 9.4 (GeForce GT625M) — the GeForce GT625M offers 248.1% better value. The Radeon HD 8610G is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8610G | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $45-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 9.4+248% |
| Codename | Sun | GK107 |
| Release | March 1 2013 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #891 | #828 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















