Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual vs GRID P40-6Q
Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
Popular choices:
GRID P40-6Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual is positioned at rank 447 and the GRID P40-6Q is on rank 396, so the GRID P40-6Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-6Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-6Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P40-6Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID P40-6Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $150), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual and GRID P40-6Q
Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
The Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 884 points.
GRID P40-6Q
The GRID P40-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual scores 884 and the GRID P40-6Q reaches 905 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-6Q).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 884 | 905+2% |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_2 (Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual) vs 12_1 (GRID P40-6Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_2 | 12_1+9% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual draws 50W versus the GRID P40-6Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual) vs 350W (GRID P40-6Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-78% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 17.7+343% | 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GRID P40-6Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.9 (Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual) vs 6.0 (GRID P40-6Q) — the GRID P40-6Q offers 1.7% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-95% | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.9 | 6.0+2% |
| Codename | — | GK104 |
| Release | August 1 2013 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #881 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual and GRID P40-6Q
