
Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual vs Quadro FX 3800

Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual
Popular choices:

Quadro FX 3800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual is positioned at rank 455 and the Quadro FX 3800 is on rank 347, so the Quadro FX 3800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 3800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 3800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 3800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 98.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+98.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual and Quadro FX 3800

Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.

Quadro FX 3800
The Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual scores 832 and the Quadro FX 3800 reaches 824 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3800).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 832 | 824 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+220% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 3800 has 1 GB. The Quadro FX 3800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FL 11_0) (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 3800). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (FL 11_0)+12% | 10_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual) vs PureVideo HD (Quadro FX 3800). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs PureVideo HD.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 3800's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3800). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6+277% | 4.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Quadro FX 3800 launched at $799 and now averages $20. The Quadro FX 3800 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.8 (Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual) vs 41.2 (Quadro FX 3800) — the Quadro FX 3800 offers 98.1% better value. The Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual | Quadro FX 3800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-81% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $20-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.8 | 41.2+98% |
| Codename | — | GT200B |
| Release | August 1 2013 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #881 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















