
Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual vs GRID K140Q

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual
Popular choices:

GRID K140Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual is positioned at rank 488 and the GRID K140Q is on rank 197, so the GRID K140Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual
Performance Per Dollar GRID K140Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID K140Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $500), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 883.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+883.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual and GRID K140Q

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual
The Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 716 points.

GRID K140Q
The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual scores 716 and the GRID K140Q reaches 728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual) vs 1,536 (GRID K140Q).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 716 | 728+2% |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual) vs 11_0 (GRID K140Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2+2% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD3 (Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GRID K140Q). Decoder: UVD3 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD3 | NVENC 3rd Gen |
| Decoder | UVD3 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual draws 50W versus the GRID K140Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual) vs 350W (GRID K140Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-78% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.3+347% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID K140Q launched at $125 and now averages $500. The Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.3 (Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual) vs 1.5 (GRID K140Q) — the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual offers 853.3% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $125-17% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-90% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3+853% | 1.5 |
| Codename | — | GK104 |
| Release | August 1 2013 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #881 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















