Radeon HD 8750M vs UHD Graphics 620

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 8750M is positioned at rank #144 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8750M

#39

Radeon RX 7700S

MSRP: $449|Avg: $350

99%

#134

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

310%

#136

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

281%

#137

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

280%

#141

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

255%

#142

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

253%

#144

Radeon HD 8750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#145

Radeon RX 580 (móvel)

MSRP: $229|Avg: $65

100%

#147

GeForce GT 630M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35

99%

#150

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

97%

#157

GeForce 830M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

96%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

95%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 8750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 620.

Insight	Radeon HD 8750M	Intel UHD Graphics 620
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8750M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 8750M Benchmark Check

Intel UHD Graphics 620 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8750M and Intel UHD Graphics 620

Radeon HD 8750M

The Radeon HD 8750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 26 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 670 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,052 points.

Intel UHD Graphics 620

The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,041 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8750M scores 1,052 and the Intel UHD Graphics 620 reaches 1,041 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8750M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 8750M) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Raw compute: 0.5146 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8750M) vs 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Radeon HD 8750M	Intel UHD Graphics 620
G3D Mark Score	1,052+1%	1,041
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 9.5
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm++
Shading Units	384+100%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5146 TFLOPS+34%	0.384 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	775 MHz	1000 MHz+29%
ROPs	8+167%	3
TMUs	24	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 8750M	Intel UHD Graphics 620
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8750M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 620 has 0 MB. The Radeon HD 8750M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	Radeon HD 8750M	Intel UHD Graphics 620
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8750M) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon HD 8750M	Intel UHD Graphics 620
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8750M) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 8750M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 620).

Feature	Radeon HD 8750M	Intel UHD Graphics 620
Encoder	VCE 1.0	QuickSync
Decoder	UVD 3.0	QuickSync
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8750M draws 50W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 620's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8750M) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 620). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.