Radeon HD 8850M vs Radeon R7 340

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 8850M vs Radeon R7 340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 8850M vs Radeon R7 340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 8850M

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 340 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon R7 340

2015

Why buy it

✅70.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 340 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 70.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 8850M instead at 973 vs 960, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 8850M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 340 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 340 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 8850M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 8850M vs Radeon R7 340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 8850M

The Radeon HD 8850M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 973 points.

Radeon R7 340

The Radeon R7 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 960 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8850M scores 973 and the Radeon R7 340 reaches 960 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8850M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 340 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8850M) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 340). Raw compute: 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8850M) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 340). Boost clocks: 625 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	Radeon HD 8850M	Radeon R7 340
G3D Mark Score	973+1%	960
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	1024+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8 TFLOPS	1.997 TFLOPS+150%
Boost Clock	625 MHz	975 MHz+56%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	64+60%
L1 Cache	160 KB	256 KB+60%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 8850M	Radeon R7 340
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8850M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 340 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 8850M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 8850M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 340. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 8850M) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 340) — the Radeon R7 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 8850M	Radeon R7 340
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8850M draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 340's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 8850M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8850M) vs 300W (Radeon R7 340). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

Feature	Radeon HD 8850M	Radeon R7 340
TDP	50W-50%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	19.5+103%	9.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 340 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon HD 8850M	Radeon R7 340
MSRP	—	$99
Codename	Venus	Trinidad
Release	April 1 2013	June 18 2015
Ranking	#894	#467

Search Radeon HD 8850M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.