RADEON HD7450
VS
GeForce GT 240M

RADEON HD7450 vs GeForce GT 240M

AMD

RADEON HD7450

2012Boost: 1250 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240M

2012Core: Up to 625 MHzBoost: 645 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON HD7450 is positioned at rank 259 and the GeForce GT 240M is on rank 392, so the RADEON HD7450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD7450

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1823%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1751%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1731%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1728%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1724%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1714%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1693%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1686%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1671%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1666%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1646%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1643%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1613%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1612%
#244
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2010%
#259
RADEON HD7450
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#260
GeForce GT 330
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
100%
#262
Radeon HD 7340G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#263
Radeon HD 8210E
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#264
Radeon 535DX
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
97%
#266
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
MSRP: $85|Avg: $15
96%
#267
GeForce GT 130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
#268
Radeon M535DX
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
94%
#269
Radeon HD 7310G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
91%
#270
Radeon HD 7450A
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
90%
#271
Radeon HD 6450
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
90%
#273
Radeon HD 3450
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
90%
#274
Radeon HD 6230
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 240M

#382
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1280%
#384
1161%
#385
1158%
#389
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1053%
#390
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1045%
#392
GeForce GT 240M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
100%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
99%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
98%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
95%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
95%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#403
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
92%
#404
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
92%
#406
92%
#407
Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 240M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON HD7450.

InsightRADEON HD7450GeForce GT 240M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-6.5%)
Leading raw performance (+6.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 240M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON HD7450 and GeForce GT 240M

AMD

RADEON HD7450

The RADEON HD7450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 199 points. Launch price was $449.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240M

The GeForce GT 240M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 212 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON HD7450 scores 199 versus the GeForce GT 240M's 212 — the GeForce GT 240M leads by 6.5%. The RADEON HD7450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 240M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (RADEON HD7450) vs 384 (GeForce GT 240M). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (RADEON HD7450) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240M). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 645 MHz.

FeatureRADEON HD7450GeForce GT 240M
G3D Mark Score
199
212+7%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792+367%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.867 TFLOPS+497%
0.48 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1250 MHz+94%
645 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
112+250%
32
L1 Cache
448 KB+1300%
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON HD7450GeForce GT 240M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON HD7450 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 240M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 240M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (RADEON HD7450) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 240M) — the RADEON HD7450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRADEON HD7450GeForce GT 240M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (RADEON HD7450) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 240M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureRADEON HD7450GeForce GT 240M
DirectX
11.2
11.1 (10_1)
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (RADEON HD7450) vs None (GeForce GT 240M). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs PureVideo HD (VP4).

FeatureRADEON HD7450GeForce GT 240M
Encoder
VCE 1.0
None
Decoder
UVD 3.1
PureVideo HD (VP4)
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON HD7450 draws 200W versus the GeForce GT 240M's 32W — a 144.8% difference. The GeForce GT 240M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON HD7450) vs 350W (GeForce GT 240M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRADEON HD7450GeForce GT 240M
TDP
200W
32W-84%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
1.0
6.6+560%