Radeon HD8970M
VS
Quadro P600

Radeon HD8970M vs Quadro P600

AMD

Radeon HD8970M

2013Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P600

2017Core: 1430 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD8970M is positioned at rank #154 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD8970M

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
95%
#143
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
322%
#145
292%
#146
291%
#150
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
265%
#151
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
263%
#154
Radeon HD8970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#156
GeForce 830M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#157
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
99%
#158
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD8970M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P600.

InsightRadeon HD8970MQuadro P600
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD8970M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD8970M and Quadro P600

AMD

Radeon HD8970M

The Radeon HD8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,369 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P600

The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD8970M scores 3,369 and the Quadro P600 reaches 3,318 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD8970M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro P600 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD8970M) vs 384 (Quadro P600). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD8970M) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1620 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD8970MQuadro P600
G3D Mark Score
3,369+2%
3,318
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1280+233%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.304 TFLOPS+85%
1.244 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1620 MHz+80%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+233%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+122%
144 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD8970MQuadro P600
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD8970M) vs 1 MB (Quadro P600) — the Quadro P600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD8970MQuadro P600
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD8970M draws 100W versus the Quadro P600's 40W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD8970M) vs 350W (Quadro P600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD8970MQuadro P600
TDP
100W
40W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
33.7
83.0+146%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P600 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD8970MQuadro P600
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$60
Codename
Neptune
GP107
Release
May 14 2013
February 7 2017
Ranking
#507
#558