Radeon HD8970M
VS
Radeon Pro W5500M

Radeon HD8970M vs Radeon Pro W5500M

AMD

Radeon HD8970M

2013Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro W5500M

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD8970M is positioned at rank 154 and the Radeon Pro W5500M is on rank 3, so the Radeon Pro W5500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD8970M

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
95%
#143
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
322%
#145
292%
#146
291%
#150
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
265%
#151
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
263%
#154
Radeon HD8970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#156
GeForce 830M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
99%
#157
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
99%
#158
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5500M

#1
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
128%
#3
Radeon Pro W5500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro W5500M is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Radeon Pro W5500M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD8970M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro W5500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD8970M.

InsightRadeon HD8970MRadeon Pro W5500M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Leading raw performance (+3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro W5500M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD8970M and Radeon Pro W5500M

AMD

Radeon HD8970M

The Radeon HD8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,369 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro W5500M

The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD8970M scores 3,369 and the Radeon Pro W5500M reaches 3,470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD8970M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro W5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD8970M) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD8970M) vs 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD8970MRadeon Pro W5500M
G3D Mark Score
3,369
3,470+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1280
1408+10%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.304 TFLOPS
4.083 TFLOPS+77%
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1450 MHz+61%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
88+10%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD8970MRadeon Pro W5500M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD8970M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD8970M) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500M) — the Radeon Pro W5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD8970MRadeon Pro W5500M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD8970M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro W5500M's 85W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD8970M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD8970MRadeon Pro W5500M
TDP
100W
85W-15%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
33.7
40.8+21%