
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU vs GeForce RTX 2060

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-15.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+15.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $340 for the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU, it costs 65% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 226.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+226.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($340) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU and GeForce RTX 2060

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,258 points.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU scores 12,258 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 15.1%. The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,258 | 14,114+15% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2+87% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+67% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1680 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2+87% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1.9 MB+116% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 72.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 160W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 72-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 40.9 | 88.2+116% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 64.7% less ($220 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 225.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $340 | $120-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.1 | 117.6+226% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | TU106 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #592 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















