
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P5200 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU and Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,258 points.

Quadro P5200 Max-Q
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1316 MHz to 1569 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,308 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU scores 12,258 and the Quadro P5200 Max-Q reaches 12,308 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Quadro P5200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 8.033 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1569 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,258 | 12,308 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+34% | 8.033 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1569 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2+40% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 960 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 Max-Q has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) — the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200 Max-Q).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Quadro P5200 Max-Q's 100W — a 100% difference. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 500W (Quadro P5200 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU | Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 100W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 40.9 | 123.1+201% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















