Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU vs RTX A4000H

AMD

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

2018Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A4000H

2021Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU vs RTX A4000H Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU vs RTX A4000H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU vs RTX A4000H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
  • 114.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 140W.
  • 10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

RTX A4000H

2021

Why buy it

  • 22.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 140W instead of 300W, a 160W reduction.
  • Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTX A4000H is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU instead at 12,258 vs 11,815, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A4000H is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 14nm, 48 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2018. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX A4000H makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU vs RTX A4000H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,258 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A4000H

The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU scores 12,258 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520 MxGPURTX A4000H
G3D Mark Score
12,258+4%
11,815
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Ampere
Process Node
14 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
3584 ×2
6144+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.75 TFLOPS ×2
19.17 TFLOPS+78%
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1560 MHz+4%
ROPs
64 ×2
96+50%
TMUs
224 ×2+17%
192
L1 Cache
0.88 MB
6 MB+582%
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A4000H gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520 MxGPURTX A4000H
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU and 192-bit on the RTX A4000H.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520 MxGPURTX A4000H
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520 MxGPURTX A4000H
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs None (RTX A4000H).

FeatureRadeon Pro V520 MxGPURTX A4000H
Encoder
VCE 4.1
None
Decoder
UVD 7.2
None
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
None
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU draws 300W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro V520 MxGPURTX A4000H
TDP
300W
140W-53%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
241mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
40.9
84.4+106%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX A4000H (2021 vs 2018).

FeatureRadeon Pro V520 MxGPURTX A4000H
MSRP
$1000
Codename
Vega 10
GA104
Release
August 26 2018
April 12 2021
Ranking
#592
#226

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.