
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
2022Why buy it
- ✅3.7% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 46.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 8GB across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 46.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
2022Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅3.7% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 46.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 8GB across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 46.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 8GB better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 344 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 547 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 456 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 342 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 445 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 239 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 8GB and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,208 points.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB scores 15,208 and the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU reaches 15,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,208 | 15,633+3% |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 3584 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+19% | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+18% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64 ×2+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 224 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+298% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 55.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060 8GB) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-43% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 89.5+72% | 52.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 8GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #147 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












