Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / RDNA 3.0) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+250%) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (280mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU scores 13,130 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1967 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,130 | 13,182 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2 | 3840 ×2+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+41% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1967 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 224 ×2 | 240 ×2+7% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+17% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU comes with 28 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 250% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 28 GB+250% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU draws 158W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 86.7% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 280mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W-61% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 83.1+152% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $3499 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 21 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #592 | #157 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
