
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅250% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 158W instead of 400W, a 242W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅23.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌153.2% higher power demand at 400W vs 158W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU scores 13,130 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1967 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,130 | 13,182 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2 | 3840 ×2+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+41% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1967 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 224 ×2 | 240 ×2+7% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+17% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has 28 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot carries 8 GB. Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU gives you 250% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 28 GB+250% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU draws 158W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 86.7% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 280mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W-61% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 83.1+152% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3499 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 21 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #592 | #157 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















