Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs Quadro M6000
Radeon Pro Vega 56
Popular choices:
Quadro M6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 56
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro Vega 56 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $500), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 757.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+757.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Quadro M6000
Radeon Pro Vega 56
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.
Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 12,104 and the Quadro M6000 reaches 11,769 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Quadro M6000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000). Raw compute: 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,104+3% | 11,769 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+17% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.96 TFLOPS+31% | 6.844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz+12% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 224+17% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1.1 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 has 12 GB. The Quadro M6000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 draws 210W versus the Quadro M6000's 250W — a 17.4% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 500W (Quadro M6000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W-16% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 57.6+22% | 47.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Quadro M6000 launched at $4999 and now averages $500. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 costs 88% less ($440 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 201.7 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 23.5 (Quadro M6000) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 offers 758.3% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-92% | $4999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-88% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 201.7+758% | 23.5 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GM200 |
| Release | August 14 2017 | March 21 2015 |
| Ranking | #222 | #228 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Quadro M6000
