
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs Radeon RX 7600M XT

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600M XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600M XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.6%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ⚠️ Potential Buffer Bottleneck | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600M XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $3,500 for the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo, it costs 91% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1120.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1120.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) | ✅More affordable ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and Radeon RX 7600M XT

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,018 points. Launch price was $4,399.

Radeon RX 7600M XT
The Radeon RX 7600M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1280 MHz to 2469 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo scores 14,018 and the Radeon RX 7600M XT reaches 14,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is built on GCN 5.1 while the Radeon RX 7600M XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Raw compute: 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 20.23 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 2469 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,018 | 14,669+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+100% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 | 20.23 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 1720 MHz | 2469 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+100% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600M XT has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600M XT offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600M XT) — a 200% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M XT) — the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+200% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 8 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 8+100% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (2x) (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Decoder: UVD 7.2 (2x) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M XT).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 (2x) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 (2x) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo draws 475W versus the Radeon RX 7600M XT's 120W — a 119.3% difference. The Radeon RX 7600M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 500W (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 4 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 475W | 120W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 120mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 4 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 29.5 | 122.2+314% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo launched at $4399 MSRP and currently averages $3500, while the Radeon RX 7600M XT launched at $329 and now averages $300. The Radeon RX 7600M XT costs 91.4% less ($3200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) vs 48.9 (Radeon RX 7600M XT) — the Radeon RX 7600M XT offers 1122.5% better value. The Radeon RX 7600M XT is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4399 | $329-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | $300-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.0 | 48.9+1123% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | Navi 33 |
| Release | June 3 2019 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #170 | #160 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















