
Radeon Pro W5700X vs GeForce GTX 1060

Radeon Pro W5700X
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5700X
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro W5700X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro W5700X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W5700X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 74.8% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (16 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5700X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+74.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-74.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (305mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $999 for the Radeon Pro W5700X, it costs 94% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 852.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5700X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+852.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700X and GeForce GTX 1060

Radeon Pro W5700X
The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro W5700X scores 17,591 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the Radeon Pro W5700X leads by 74.8%. The Radeon Pro W5700X is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 2040 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,591+75% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.4 TFLOPS+6% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2040 MHz+18% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5700X comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The Radeon Pro W5700X offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Radeon Pro W5700X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700X draws 205W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 13% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 305mm vs 173mm, occupying 4 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 180W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 400W-38% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 305mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 4 | 2-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 85.8+53% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5700X launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $999, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 94% less ($939 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 852.8% better value. The Radeon Pro W5700X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $249-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $999 | $60-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6 | 167.7+853% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GP104 |
| Release | December 11 2019 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #130 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














