
Radeon Pro W5700X

Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Radeon Pro W5700X vs Radeon RX 7650 GRE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro W5700X vs Radeon RX 7650 GRE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro W5700X vs Radeon RX 7650 GRE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7650 GRE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌258.1% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 66.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
2025Why buy it
- ✅19.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $720 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 276.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 66.3 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro W5700X vs Radeon RX 7650 GRE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro W5700X
The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon RX 7650 GRE
The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Fevereiro 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2695 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,486 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro W5700X scores 17,591 versus the Radeon RX 7650 GRE's 18,486 — the Radeon RX 7650 GRE leads by 5.1%. The Radeon Pro W5700X is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Raw compute: 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 22.08 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Boost clocks: 2040 MHz vs 2695 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,591 | 18,486+5% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.4 TFLOPS | 22.08 TFLOPS+135% |
| Boost Clock | 2040 MHz | 2695 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+13% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7650 GRE is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro W5700X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5700X has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7650 GRE carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro W5700X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5700X and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 7650 GRE. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7650 GRE) — the Radeon Pro W5700X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700X draws 205W versus the Radeon RX 7650 GRE's 165W — a 21.6% difference. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 305mm vs 240mm, occupying 4 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 165W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 305mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 4 | 2-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 85.8 | 112.0+31% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro W5700X came in at $999, while the Radeon RX 7650 GRE launched at $279. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7650 GRE was 72.1% cheaper ($720 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE) — the Radeon RX 7650 GRE offers 276.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 7650 GRE (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $279-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6 | 66.3+277% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 33 |
| Release | December 11 2019 | Fevereiro 2025 |
| Ranking | #130 | #96 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














