Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W5700X

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 6000

2018Core: 1440 MHzBoost: 1770 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro W5700X

2019Core: 1243 MHzBoost: 2040 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W5700X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W5700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX 6000

2018

Why buy it

  • 73.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
  • Measures 267mm instead of 305mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 530.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $6,300 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • 26.8% higher power demand at 260W vs 205W.

Radeon Pro W5700X

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,301 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 520.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.6 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 205W instead of 260W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 14.2% longer card at 305mm vs 267mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro RTX 6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 73.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (17,887 vs 17,591), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro W5700X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro W5700X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,301 cheaper on MSRP at $999 vs $6,300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 520.2% (17.6 vs 2.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro RTX 6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W5700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 6000

The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.

AMD

Radeon Pro W5700X

The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 6000 scores 17,887 and the Radeon Pro W5700X reaches 17,591 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 6000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro W5700X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2040 MHz.

FeatureQuadro RTX 6000Radeon Pro W5700X
G3D Mark Score
17,887+2%
17,591
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
4608+100%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.31 TFLOPS+74%
9.4 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
2040 MHz+15%
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
288+100%
144
L2 Cache
6 MB+50%
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The Quadro RTX 6000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W5700X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureQuadro RTX 6000Radeon Pro W5700X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 6000 has 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700X carries 16 GB. Quadro RTX 6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 6000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5700X. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro RTX 6000Radeon Pro W5700X
VRAM Capacity
24 GB+50%
16 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
384-bit+200%
128-bit
L2 Cache
6 MB+50%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureQuadro RTX 6000Radeon Pro W5700X
DirectX
12.2+2%
12.0
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X).

FeatureQuadro RTX 6000Radeon Pro W5700X
Encoder
NVENC 7.0
VCN 2.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP10
VCN 2.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
HEVC,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 6000 draws 260W versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 205W — a 23.7% difference. The Radeon Pro W5700X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro RTX 6000Radeon Pro W5700X
TDP
260W
205W-21%
Recommended PSU
650W
650W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
305mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2-50%
4
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
68.8
85.8+25%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro RTX 6000 came in at $6300, while the Radeon Pro W5700X launched at $999. On MSRP, Radeon Pro W5700X was 84.1% cheaper ($5301 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the Radeon Pro W5700X offers 528.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro W5700X (2019 vs 2018).

FeatureQuadro RTX 6000Radeon Pro W5700X
MSRP
$6300
$999-84%
Performance per Dollar
2.8
17.6+529%
Codename
TU102
Navi 10
Release
August 13 2018
December 11 2019
Ranking
#99
#130

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.