
Quadro RTX 6000

Radeon Pro W5700X
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W5700X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W5700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅73.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 305mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌530.6% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ❌26.8% higher power demand at 260W vs 205W.
Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,301 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 520.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.6 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 260W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌14.2% longer card at 305mm vs 267mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W5700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.

Radeon Pro W5700X
The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 6000 scores 17,887 and the Radeon Pro W5700X reaches 17,591 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 6000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro W5700X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,887+2% | 17,591 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+100% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS+74% | 9.4 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2040 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+100% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 6000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W5700X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 6000 has 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700X carries 16 GB. Quadro RTX 6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 6000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5700X. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+50% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | HEVC,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 6000 draws 260W versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 205W — a 23.7% difference. The Radeon Pro W5700X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 205W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 305mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.8 | 85.8+25% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 6000 came in at $6300, while the Radeon Pro W5700X launched at $999. On MSRP, Radeon Pro W5700X was 84.1% cheaper ($5301 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the Radeon Pro W5700X offers 528.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro W5700X (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6300 | $999-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 17.6+529% |
| Codename | TU102 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #99 | #130 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














