G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs Quadro RTX 6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs Quadro RTX 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,601 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 837.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 11 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 11 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quadro RTX 6000

2018

Why buy it

✅46.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅118.2% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 11 GB).
✅GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro RTX 6000 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
801.3% HIGHER MSRP
$6,300 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 26.6 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro RTX 6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 46.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1080 Ti instead at 18,606 vs 17,887, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX 6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 24 GB vs 11 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 16nm, 72 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,601 cheaper on MSRP at $699 vs $6,300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 837.5% (26.6 vs 2.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Quadro RTX 6000 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs Quadro RTX 6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 10 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1481 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,606 points. Launch price was $699.

Quadro RTX 6000

The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti scores 18,606 and the Quadro RTX 6000 reaches 17,887 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is built on Pascal while the Quadro RTX 6000 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000). Raw compute: 11.34 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1770 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 Ti	Quadro RTX 6000
G3D Mark Score	18,606+4%	17,887
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3584	4608+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.34 TFLOPS	16.31 TFLOPS+44%
Boost Clock	1582 MHz	1770 MHz+12%
ROPs	88	96+9%
TMUs	224	288+29%
L1 Cache	1.3 MB	4.5 MB+246%
L2 Cache	2.75 MB	6 MB+118%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 Ti	Quadro RTX 6000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 11 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 6000 carries 24 GB. Quadro RTX 6000 gives you 118.2% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 484 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) — a 58.7% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Memory bus width is 352-bit on the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 6000. L2 Cache: 2.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 Ti	Quadro RTX 6000
VRAM Capacity	11 GB	24 GB+118%
Memory Type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	484 GB/s	768 GB/s+59%
Bus Width	352-bit	384-bit+9%
L2 Cache	2.75 MB	6 MB+118%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 Ti	Quadro RTX 6000
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 Ti	Quadro RTX 6000
Encoder	NVENC 4th gen	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd gen	PureVideo HD VP10
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti draws 250W versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 260W — a 3.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 6000). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 Ti	Quadro RTX 6000
TDP	250W-4%	260W
Recommended PSU	600W-8%	650W
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	112mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	74.4+8%	68.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti came in at $699, while the Quadro RTX 6000 launched at $6300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti was 88.9% cheaper ($5601 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) — the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti offers 850% better value. The newer card here is Quadro RTX 6000 (2018 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 Ti	Quadro RTX 6000
MSRP	$699-89%	$6300
Performance per Dollar	26.6+850%	2.8
Codename	GP102	TU102
Release	March 10 2017	August 13 2018
Ranking	#95	#99

Search GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on Amazon

Search Quadro RTX 6000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.