
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2017 hardware with 11 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌159.9% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.6 vs 69.8 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅7.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 162.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.8 vs 26.6 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 10 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1481 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,606 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,783 points. Launch price was $309.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti scores 18,606 and the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB reaches 18,783 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB). Raw compute: 11.34 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 2450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,606 | 18,783 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.34 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 2450 MHz+55% |
| ROPs | 88+38% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+56% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+160% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2.75 MB | 3 MB+9% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 11 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB carries 10 GB. GeForce GTX 1080 Ti gives you 10% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 484 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) — a 51.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. Memory bus width is 352-bit on the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and 160-bit on the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB. L2 Cache: 2.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 11 GB+10% | 10 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 484 GB/s+51% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 352-bit+120% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2.75 MB | 3 MB+9% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB's 170W — a 38.1% difference. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 170W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 74.4 | 110.5+49% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti came in at $699, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB launched at $269. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB was 61.5% cheaper ($430 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 69.8 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB) — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB offers 162.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $269-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.6 | 69.8+162% |
| Codename | GP102 | Navi 22 |
| Release | March 10 2017 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #95 | #93 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














