GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs RTX A4000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

2017Core: 1481 MHzBoost: 1582 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A4000

2021Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs RTX A4000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs RTX A4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs RTX A4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $412 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
  • Delivers 51.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 11 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 11 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 78.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 140W.
  • 10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

RTX A4000

2021

Why buy it

  • 23.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 45.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 11 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 140W instead of 250W, a 110W reduction.
  • Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 58.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,111 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 26.6 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTX A4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.6% in PassMark G3D (19,463 vs 18,606), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 11 GB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 16nm, 48 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $412 cheaper on MSRP at $699 vs $1,111, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 51.9% (26.6 vs 17.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, RTX A4000 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs RTX A4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 10 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1481 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,606 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

RTX A4000

The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti scores 18,606 and the RTX A4000 reaches 19,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is built on Pascal while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 11.34 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 TiRTX A4000
G3D Mark Score
18,606
19,463+5%
Architecture
Pascal
Ampere
Process Node
16 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
3584
6144+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)
11.34 TFLOPS
19.17 TFLOPS+69%
Boost Clock
1582 MHz+1%
1560 MHz
ROPs
88
96+9%
TMUs
224+17%
192
L1 Cache
1.3 MB
6 MB+362%
L2 Cache
2.75 MB
4 MB+45%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 TiRTX A4000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti has 11 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 carries 16 GB. RTX A4000 gives you 45.5% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 484 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) — a 8% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. Memory bus width is 352-bit on the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and 192-bit on the RTX A4000. L2 Cache: 2.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000) — the RTX A4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 TiRTX A4000
VRAM Capacity
11 GB
16 GB+45%
Memory Type
GDDR5X
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
484 GB/s+8%
448 GB/s
Bus Width
352-bit+83%
192-bit
L2 Cache
2.75 MB
4 MB+45%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 TiRTX A4000
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 TiRTX A4000
Encoder
NVENC 4th gen
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC 3rd gen
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti draws 250W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 56.4% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 TiRTX A4000
TDP
250W
140W-44%
Recommended PSU
600W-8%
650W
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
241mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
74.4
139.0+87%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti came in at $699, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti was 37.1% cheaper ($412 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti offers 52% better value. The newer card here is RTX A4000 (2021 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 TiRTX A4000
MSRP
$699-37%
$1111
Performance per Dollar
26.6+52%
17.5
Codename
GP102
GA104
Release
March 10 2017
April 12 2021
Ranking
#95
#85

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.