GeForce GTX 1070 SLI vs Quadro RTX 6000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

2016Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1683 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 6000

2018Core: 1440 MHzBoost: 1770 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI vs Quadro RTX 6000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI vs Quadro RTX 6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI vs Quadro RTX 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,542 less on MSRP ($758 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 726.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.5 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($758 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.

Quadro RTX 6000

2018

Why buy it

  • 148.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
  • GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro RTX 6000 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 731.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $6,300 MSRPvs$758 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 23.5 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $758 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro RTX 6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 148.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (17,887 vs 17,790), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro RTX 6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 24 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 16nm, 72 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,542 cheaper on MSRP at $758 vs $6,300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 726.6% (23.5 vs 2.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Quadro RTX 6000 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI vs Quadro RTX 6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,790 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 6000

The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI scores 17,790 and the Quadro RTX 6000 reaches 17,887 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is built on Pascal while the Quadro RTX 6000 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1770 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 SLIQuadro RTX 6000
G3D Mark Score
17,790
17,887
Architecture
Pascal
Turing
Process Node
16 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
3840
4608+20%
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1770 MHz+5%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 SLIQuadro RTX 6000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 6000 carries 24 GB. Quadro RTX 6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) — a 200% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 1070 SLI and 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 6000.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 SLIQuadro RTX 6000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
24 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
768 GB/s+200%
Bus Width
256-bit
384-bit+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 SLIQuadro RTX 6000
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 (2x) vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 SLIQuadro RTX 6000
Encoder
NVENC 5.0 (2x)
NVENC 7.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP7 (2x)
PureVideo HD VP10
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI draws 300W versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 260W — a 14.3% difference. The Quadro RTX 6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 6000). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 SLIQuadro RTX 6000
TDP
300W
260W-13%
Recommended PSU
750W
650W-13%
Power Connector
2x 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
112mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
59.3
68.8+16%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1070 SLI came in at $758, while the Quadro RTX 6000 launched at $6300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI was 88% cheaper ($5542 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.5 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) — the GeForce GTX 1070 SLI offers 739.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro RTX 6000 (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 SLIQuadro RTX 6000
MSRP
$758-88%
$6300
Performance per Dollar
23.5+739%
2.8
Codename
Pascal GP104 SLI
TU102
Release
August 16 2016
August 13 2018
Ranking
#142
#99

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.