
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1070 SLI.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $160 versus $175 for the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, it costs 9% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 7.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+7.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($160) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($175) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 SLI and GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,790 points.

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 9 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1605 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,166 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI scores 17,790 and the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER reaches 18,166 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1770 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,790 | 18,166+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+50% | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 1770 MHz+5% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 448 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 (2x) vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 (2x) | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER's 215W — a 33% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 215W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3 | 84.5+42% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI launched at $758 MSRP and currently averages $160, while the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER launched at $499 and now averages $175. The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI costs 8.6% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 111.2 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI) vs 103.8 (GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1070 SLI offers 7.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 SLI | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $758 | $499-34% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $160-9% | $175 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.2+7% | 103.8 |
| Codename | Pascal GP104 SLI | TU104 |
| Release | August 16 2016 | July 9 2019 |
| Ranking | #142 | #97 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














