
Quadro RTX 6000

Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon RX 7650 GRE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon RX 7650 GRE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon RX 7650 GRE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅45.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌2158.1% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 66.3 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌57.6% higher power demand at 260W vs 165W.
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,021 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2233.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 66.3 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 260W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon RX 7650 GRE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.

Radeon RX 7650 GRE
The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Fevereiro 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2695 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,486 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 6000 scores 17,887 and the Radeon RX 7650 GRE reaches 18,486 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 6000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 22.08 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2695 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE) with 576 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,887 | 18,486+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+125% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS | 22.08 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2695 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+125% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+800% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+125% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7650 GRE is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro RTX 6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 6000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 6000 has 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7650 GRE carries 8 GB. Quadro RTX 6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7650 GRE) — a 166.7% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 6000 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 7650 GRE. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7650 GRE) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+167% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 6000 draws 260W versus the Radeon RX 7650 GRE's 165W — a 44.7% difference. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7650 GRE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 165W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 68.8 | 112.0+63% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 6000 came in at $6300, while the Radeon RX 7650 GRE launched at $279. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7650 GRE was 95.6% cheaper ($6021 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7650 GRE) — the Radeon RX 7650 GRE offers 2267.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 7650 GRE (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon RX 7650 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6300 | $279-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 66.3+2268% |
| Codename | TU102 | Navi 33 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | Fevereiro 2025 |
| Ranking | #99 | #96 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














