
Quadro RTX 6000

Radeon Pro W6800X
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W6800X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W6800X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W6800X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅9.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌125.1% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$2,799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $2,799 MSRP).
- ❌30% higher power demand at 260W vs 200W.
Radeon Pro W6800X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,501 less on MSRP ($2,799 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 126.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($2,799 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 260W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 6000 vs Radeon Pro W6800X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.

Radeon Pro W6800X
The Radeon Pro W6800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2087 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,000 points. Launch price was $2,799.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 6000 scores 17,887 and the Radeon Pro W6800X reaches 18,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 6000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro W6800X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro W6800X). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 16.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6800X). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2087 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 60 (Radeon Pro W6800X) with 576 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,887 | 18,000 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+20% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS+2% | 16.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2087 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 288+20% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+500% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+20% | 60 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 6000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W6800X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 6000 has 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6800X carries 32 GB. Radeon Pro W6800X gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon Pro W6800X) — a 33.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 6000 and 256-bit on the Radeon Pro W6800X. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6800X) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 32 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+33% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6800X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6800X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6800X).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 6000 draws 260W versus the Radeon Pro W6800X's 200W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon Pro W6800X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6800X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 200W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.8 | 90.0+31% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 6000 came in at $6300, while the Radeon Pro W6800X launched at $2799. On MSRP, Radeon Pro W6800X was 55.6% cheaper ($3501 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro W6800X) — the Radeon Pro W6800X offers 128.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro W6800X (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6300 | $2799-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 6.4+129% |
| Codename | TU102 | Navi 21 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #99 | #158 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














