Quadro RTX 6000
TITAN Xp
Quadro RTX 6000 vs TITAN Xp Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 6000 vs TITAN Xp FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 6000 vs TITAN Xp: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅42.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅TITAN Xp is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro RTX 6000 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌425.4% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$1,199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
TITAN Xp
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,101 less on MSRP ($1,199 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 450.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 6000 vs TITAN Xp Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.
TITAN Xp
The TITAN Xp is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1405 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,752 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 6000 scores 17,887 and the TITAN Xp reaches 18,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 6000 is built on Turing while the TITAN Xp uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 3,840 (TITAN Xp). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 12.15 TFLOPS (TITAN Xp). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,887 | 18,752+5% |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+20% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS+34% | 12.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+12% | 1582 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 288+20% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+221% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 6000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The TITAN Xp leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 6000 has 24 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN Xp carries 12 GB. Quadro RTX 6000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 547.7 GB/s (TITAN Xp) — a 40.2% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 6000 and 384-bit on the TITAN Xp. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 3 MB (TITAN Xp) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+100% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+40% | 547.7 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 12.0 (TITAN Xp). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs NVENC 5.0 (TITAN Xp). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (TITAN Xp).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 6000 draws 260W versus the TITAN Xp's 250W — a 3.9% difference. The TITAN Xp is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 600W (TITAN Xp). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 250W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.8 | 75.0+9% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 6000 came in at $6300, while the TITAN Xp launched at $1199. On MSRP, TITAN Xp was 81% cheaper ($5101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 15.6 (TITAN Xp) — the TITAN Xp offers 457.1% better value. The newer card here is Quadro RTX 6000 (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | TITAN Xp |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6300 | $1199-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.8 | 15.6+457% |
| Codename | TU102 | GP102 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | April 6 2017 |
| Ranking | #99 | #87 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 6000 and TITAN Xp
