Radeon R1E vs GeForce 510
Radeon R1E
Popular choices:
GeForce 510
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 510
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R1E is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 510 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R1E | GeForce 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 510 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon R1E, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 214.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R1E | GeForce 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+214.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R1E and GeForce 510
Radeon R1E
The Radeon R1E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 301 points.
GeForce 510
The GeForce 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 290 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R1E scores 301 and the GeForce 510 reaches 290 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R1E is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce 510 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 128 (Radeon R1E) vs 2,048 (GeForce 510). Raw compute: 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon R1E) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 510). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1155 MHz. Ray tracing: 2 RT cores (Radeon R1E) vs 16 (GeForce 510) vs 64.
| Feature | Radeon R1E | GeForce 510 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 301+4% | 290 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 128 | 2048+1500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5632 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS+740% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+90% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | 40+900% |
| TMUs | 8 | 64+700% |
| L1 Cache | 0.03 MB | 2 MB+6567% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 2 | 16+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R1E | GeForce 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R1E comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 510 has 2 GB. The GeForce 510 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R1E | GeForce 510 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R1E) vs 11.0 (GeForce 510). Vulkan: 1.0 vs None. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R1E | GeForce 510 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.5+10% | 4.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R1E) vs No (GeForce 510). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,HEVC (Radeon R1E) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 510).
| Feature | Radeon R1E | GeForce 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,HEVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R1E draws 15W versus the GeForce 510's 25W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R1E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R1E) vs 350W (GeForce 510). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon R1E | GeForce 510 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-40% | 25W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 64mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 20.1+73% | 11.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R1E launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 510 launched at $99 and now averages $15. The GeForce 510 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.1 (Radeon R1E) vs 19.3 (GeForce 510) — the GeForce 510 offers 216.4% better value. The Radeon R1E is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon R1E | GeForce 510 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 19.3+216% |
| Codename | Dragon Range | GA107 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #843 | #407 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R1E and GeForce 510
