
Radeon R2 vs Radeon HD 6480G

Radeon R2
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6480G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6480G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R2 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon R2 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6480G lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6480G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R2.
| Insight | Radeon R2 | Radeon HD 6480G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $49 versus $50 for the Radeon HD 6480G, it costs 2% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 0.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R2 | Radeon HD 6480G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R2 and Radeon HD 6480G

Radeon R2
The Radeon R2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 254 points.

Radeon HD 6480G
The Radeon HD 6480G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 21 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 151W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 257 points. Launch price was $239.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R2 scores 254 and the Radeon HD 6480G reaches 257 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R2 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon HD 6480G uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R2) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 6480G). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R2) vs 2.016 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6480G). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R2 | Radeon HD 6480G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 254 | 257+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1120+192% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 2.016 TFLOPS+156% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz+14% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 56+133% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 224 KB+133% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R2 | Radeon HD 6480G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R2) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6480G) — the Radeon HD 6480G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R2 | Radeon HD 6480G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R2 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 6480G's 151W — a 100.5% difference. The Radeon R2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R2) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6480G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R2 | Radeon HD 6480G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 151W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.1+200% | 1.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R2 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon HD 6480G launched at $50 and now averages $50. The Radeon R2 costs 2% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.2 (Radeon R2) vs 5.1 (Radeon HD 6480G) — the Radeon R2 offers 2% better value. The Radeon R2 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon R2 | Radeon HD 6480G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-2% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.2+2% | 5.1 |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Barts |
| Release | May 13 2019 | October 21 2010 |
| Ranking | #858 | #661 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















