Radeon R2E vs Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Radeon R2E
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R2E is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4650 AGP.
| Insight | Radeon R2E | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4650 AGP offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4650 AGP holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $49), it costs 59% less, resulting in a 141.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R2E | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+141.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R2E and Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Radeon R2E
The Radeon R2E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 211 points. Launch price was $109.
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 208 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R2E scores 211 and the Radeon HD 4650 AGP reaches 208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R2E is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 4650 AGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R2E) vs 480 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R2E) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650 AGP).
| Feature | Radeon R2E | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 211+1% | 208 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+7% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8192 TFLOPS+42% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+167% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R2E | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R2E | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R2E draws 55W versus the Radeon HD 4650 AGP's 45W — a 20% difference. The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R2E) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R2E | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 45W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 193mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.8 | 4.6+21% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R2E launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon HD 4650 AGP launched at $80 and now averages $20. The Radeon HD 4650 AGP costs 59.2% less ($29 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.3 (Radeon R2E) vs 10.4 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP) — the Radeon HD 4650 AGP offers 141.9% better value. The Radeon R2E is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon R2E | Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $80 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $20-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.3 | 10.4+142% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Onega |
| Release | December 20 2013 | April 19 2011 |
| Ranking | #738 | #926 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R2E and Radeon HD 4650 AGP
