Radeon R5 235X vs Radeon HD 8330
Radeon R5 235X
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 235X is positioned at rank 209 and the Radeon HD 8330 is on rank 213, so the Radeon R5 235X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 235X
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8330
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 235X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8330.
| Insight | Radeon R5 235X | Radeon HD 8330 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8330 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8330 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 48.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 235X | Radeon HD 8330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+48.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 235X and Radeon HD 8330
Radeon R5 235X
The Radeon R5 235X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 277 points. Launch price was $99.
Radeon HD 8330
The Radeon HD 8330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 235X scores 277 and the Radeon HD 8330 reaches 275 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 235X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 8330 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R5 235X) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 8330). Raw compute: 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 235X) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8330).
| Feature | Radeon R5 235X | Radeon HD 8330 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 277 | 275 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1120+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.216 TFLOPS | 1.792 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+43% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 235X | Radeon HD 8330 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 235X comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8330 has 512 MB. The Radeon R5 235X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R5 235X) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8330) — the Radeon HD 8330 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 235X | Radeon HD 8330 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 235X draws 80W versus the Radeon HD 8330's 175W — a 74.5% difference. The Radeon R5 235X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 235X) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8330). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R5 235X | Radeon HD 8330 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-54% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.5+119% | 1.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 235X launched at $49 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 8330 launched at $50 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 8330 costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.5 (Radeon R5 235X) vs 27.5 (Radeon HD 8330) — the Radeon HD 8330 offers 48.6% better value. The Radeon R5 235X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon R5 235X | Radeon HD 8330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-2% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.5 | 27.5+49% |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Cypress |
| Release | February 13 2014 | February 25 2010 |
| Ranking | #655 | #724 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 235X and Radeon HD 8330
